Wikipedia writers are not copywriters. Copywriting is just like a billboard while Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Copywriting provokes its audience to take action while Wikipedia content just teaches them how to take action. Usually copywriting use the language of pleasure like they use too many adjectives, metaphors, jargon while professional Wikipedia writers use factual language which is obvious. Wikipedia’s manuals don’t allow the user to add fantasies and fictions in their words and sentences and require a direct speech or active voice, unlike copywriters’ passive voice. How cannot one distinguish between the two entirely two different paths of writing?
0
0
Answer Now
Comment
Report
0
Answers
Important Note โ Preparing for CA Final?
CAKART provides Indias top faculty each subject video classes and lectures โ online & in Pen Drive/ DVD โ at very cost effective rates. Get video classes from CAKART.in. Quality is much better than local tuition, so results are much better.
Watch Sample Video Now by clicking on the link(s) below โ
For any questions Request A Call Back