Answer below questions and predict your rank
  • How important it is for you to pass the exam in this attempt?
  • What percentage of course you have finished well so far roughly?
  • How many hours you study in a day?
  • How many times you have revised the topics you have finished
  • Have you taken online or pen drive or live class from a renowned faculty?
  • What percentage of the classes you have watched?
  • Have you attempted mock tests or practice tests yet?
  • Are you planning to attempt mock tests conducted by external bodies- ICAI, ICSI, ICMAI or other institute?
  • How many tests you have taken?
  • Did you manage to finish the test papers on time?
  • Are you strictly following study material provided by the exam conducting authority such as ICAI/ICSI/ICMAI/Other Body?
  • How is your health in general?
  • How is your food habit?
  • Any interest in yoga or exercise or play sports regularly?
  • Planning to sleep well nights before the exams?
  • Planning to have light food and water before exams?

What is doctrine of holding out?

Avatar 37a3bd7bc7328f0ead2c0f6f635dddf60615e676e6b4ddf964144012e529de45 asked

What is doctrine of holding out ?

    0       0 Answer Now Comment Report
4 Answers
Open uri20170510 32134 1c996lj?1494421732 answered

Partnership by Holding Out is also known as partnership by estoppels. Holding out is merely application of the principle of estoppel which is a rule of evidence wherein a person is prevented or estopped from denying a statement he made or existence of facts that he makes another person believe. In simple terms, if a person represents that he is a partner of a particular firm, he is estopped from denying this representation later on. The doctrine of holding out has been provided under section 28 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932. Section 28 reads as:
Holding Out - (1) Anyone who by words spoken or written or by conduct represent himself, or knowingly permits himself to be represented, to be a partner in a firm, is liable as a partner in that firm to anyone who has on the faith of any such representation given credit to the firm, whether the person representing himself or represented to be a partner does or does not know that the representation has reached the person so giving credit.
(2) Where after partner's death the business continued in the old firm-name, the continued use of that name or of the deceased partner's name as a part thereof shall not of itself make his legal representative or his estate liable for any act of the firm done after his death.”

    0       0 Comment Report
Important Note – Preparing for CA Final?
CAKART provides Indias top faculty each subject video classes and lectures – online & in Pen Drive/ DVD – at very cost effective rates. Get video classes from Quality is much better than local tuition, so results are much better.
Watch Sample Video Now by clicking on the link(s) below – 
For any questions Request A Call Back  
Avatar 37a3bd7bc7328f0ead2c0f6f635dddf60615e676e6b4ddf964144012e529de45 answered

It says that, if a person is held out by the company as its officer, the act of the person falling within the actual or ostensible authority of the officer will be binding on the company

    0       0 Comment Report
Avatar 37a3bd7bc7328f0ead2c0f6f635dddf60615e676e6b4ddf964144012e529de45 answered

**DOCTRINE OF HOLDING OUT** Doctrine of holding out also known as transfer of ostensible owner. A person who represents himself as a true owner of the property with the consent of the true owner is known as ostensible owner. The ostensible owner has a right to transfer the property for consideration. The above doctrine is an exception to the rule that A person cannot confer a better title than he himself has. Thanks

    2       0 Comment Report
Open uri20170510 32134 1nqu8aj?1494421649 answered

HI Doctrine of Holding Out makes an exception to the rule that a person cannot confer a better title than he himself has The Doctrine of Holding Out creates an exception to the Doctrine of Constructive Notice. It says that, if a person is held out by the company as its officer, the act of the person falling within the actual or ostensible authority of the officer will be binding on the company for instance In a case the court held a person as partner, and hence liable for repayment of firm’s debt the court went on to say that even though he was not proved to be formal partner – he could still under the doctrine of holding out (which is a species of estoppel) can be held to be a partner for the reason that he “represented as a partner” and at any rate “knowingly permitted himself to be so represented” on faith of which representation bank went on to give credit – now it would be inequitable to let him wriggle out of his liability.

    0       0 Comment Report
Get Notifications
Watch best faculty demo video classes

These top faculty video lectures will
help u prepare like nothing else can.